Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11542591›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma1998

Hypergravity can reduce but not enhance the gravitropic response of Chara globularis protonemata.

D Hodick, A Sievers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D HodickBotansiches Institut, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn.
A Sievers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the position of the statoliths and the direction and rate of tip growth in negatively gravitropic protonemata of Chara globularis was studied with a centrifuge video microscope. Cells placed perpendicularly to the acceleration vector (stimulation angle 90 degrees) showed a gradual reduction of the gravitropic curvature with increasing accelerations from 1 g to 8 g despite complete sedimentation of all statoliths on the centrifugal cell flank. It is argued that the increased weight of the statoliths in hypergravity impairs their acropetal transport which is induced when the cell axis deviates from the normal upright orientation. When the statoliths were centrifuged deep into the apical dome at 6 g and a stimulation angle of 170 degrees the gravitropic curvature after 1 h was identical to that determined for the same cells at 1 g and the same stimulation angle. This indicates that gravitropism in Chara protonemata is either independent of the pressure exerted by the statoliths on an underlying structure or is already saturated at 1 g. When the statoliths were moved along the apical cell wall at 8 g and the stimulation angle was gradually increased from 170 degrees to 220 degrees the gravitropic curvature reverted sharply when the cluster of statoliths passed over the cell pole. This experiment supports the hypothesis that in Chara protonemata asymmetrically distributed statoliths inside the apical dome displace the Spitzenkorper and thus the centre of growth, resulting in gravitropic bending. In contrast to the positively gravitropic Chara rhizoids, no modifications either in the transport of statoliths during basipetal acceleration (6 g, stimulation angle 0 degree, 5 h) or in the subsequent gravitropic response could be detected in the protonemata. The different effects of centrifugation on the positioning of statoliths in Chara protonemata and rhizoids indicate subtle differences in the function of the cytoskeleton in both types of cells.

Indexed as

HypergravityCentrifugationChlorophytaGravitationGravitropismGravity SensingMicroscopy, ElectronPlastidsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID11542591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.