Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11541070›Full record

ArticlePlanta1996

Anomalous gravitropic response of Chara rhizoids during enhanced accelerations.

M Braun

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M BraunBotanisches Institut, Universitat Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centrifugal accelerations of 50-250 g were applied to rhizoids of Chara globularis Thuill. at stimulation angles (alpha) of 5-90 degrees between the acceleration vector and the rhizoid axis. After the start of centrifugation, the statoliths were pressed asymmetrically onto the centrifugal flank of the apical cell wall. In contrast to the well-known bending (by bowing) under 1 g, the rhizoids responded in two distinct phases. Following an initial phase of sharp bending (by bulging), which is similar to the negatively gravitropic response of Chara protonemata, rhizoids stopped bending and, in the second phase, grew straight in directions clearly deviating from the direction of acceleration. These response angles (beta) between the axis of the bent part of the rhizoid and the acceleration vector were strictly correlated with the g-level of acceleration. The higher the acceleration the greater was beta. Except for the sharp bending, the shape and growth rate of the centrifuged rhizoids were not different from those of gravistimulated control rhizoids at 1 g. These results indicate that gravitropic bending of rhizoids during enhanced accelerations (5 degrees < or = alpha < or = 90 degrees) is caused not only by subapical differential flank growth, as it is the case at 1 g, but also by also by the centripetal displacement of the growth centre as was recently discussed for the negative gravitropism of Chara protonemata. A hypothesis for cytoskeletally mediated polar growth is presented based on data from positive gravitropic bending of Chara rhizoids at 1 g and from the anomalous gravitropic bending of rhizoids compared with the negatively gravitropic bending of Chara protonemata. The data obtained are also relevant to a general understanding of graviperception in higher-plant organs.

Indexed as

AccelerationGravitropismHypergravityActinsCentrifugationChlorophytaEndoplasmic ReticulumMicroscopy, ElectronPlastidsTime FactorsActins

Identifiers

PMID11541070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.