Micromanipulation of statoliths in gravity-sensing Chara rhizoids by optical tweezers.

Infrared laser traps (optical tweezers) were used to micromanipulate statoliths in gravity-sensing rhizoids of the green alga Chara vulgaris Vail. We were able to hold and move statoliths with high accuracy and to observe directly the effects of statolith position on cell growth in horizontally positioned rhizoids. The first step in gravitropism, namely the physical action of gravity on statoliths, can be simulated by optical tweezers. The direct laser microirradiation of the rhizoid apex did not cause any visible damage to the cells. Through lateral positioning of statoliths a differential growth of the opposite flank of the cell wall could be induced, corresponding to bending growth in gravitropism. The acropetal displacement of the statolith complex into the extreme apex of the rhizoid caused a temporary decrease in cell growth rate. The rhizoids regained normal growth after remigration of the statoliths to their initial position 10-30 micrometers basal to the rhizoid apex. During basipetal displacement of statoliths, cell growth continued and the statoliths remigrated towards the rhizoid tip after release from the optical trap. The resistance to statolith displacement increased towards the nucleus. The basipetal displacement of the whole complex of statoliths for a long distance (>100 micrometers) caused an increase in cell diameter and a subsequent regaining of normal growth after the statoliths reappeared in the rhizoid apex. We conclude that the statolith displacement interferes with the mechanism of tip growth, i.e. with the transport of Golgi vesicles, either directly by mechanically blocking their flow and/or, indirectly, by disturbing the actomyosin system. In the presence of the actin inhibitor cytochalasin B the optical forces required for acropetal and basipetal displacement of statoliths were significantly reduced to a similar level. The lateral displacement of statoliths was not changed by cytochalasin B. The results indicate: (i) the viscous resistance to optical displacement of statoliths depend mainly on actin, (ii) the lateral displacement of statoliths is not impeded by actin filaments, (iii) the axially directed actin-mediated forces against optical displacement of statoliths (for a distance of 10 micrometers) are stronger in the basipetal than in the acropetal direction, (iv) the forces acting on single statoliths by axially oriented actin filaments are estimated to be in the range of 11-110 pN for acropetal and of 18-180 pN for basipetal statolith displacements.