Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11536653›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1994

How long did it take for life to begin and evolve to cyanobacteria?

A Lazcano, S L Miller, New Collective Author

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1994. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Requirements and limits for life in the context of exoplanets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bayesian analysis of the astrobiological implications of life's early emergence on Earth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Big Bang, Superstring Theory and the origin of life on the Earth.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2006
    Article
  17. The last common ancestor: what's in a name?Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2005
    Article
  18. Pyrite suspended in artificial sea water catalyzes hydrolysis of adsorbed ATP: enhancing effect of acetate.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 1999
    Article
  19. About various definitions of life.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 1998
    Article
  20. The stability of the RNA bases: implications for the origin of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A LazcanoFacultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico, DF.
S L Miller
New Collective Author
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is convincing paleontological evidence showing that stromatolite-building phototactic prokaryotes were already in existence 3.5 x 10(9) years ago. Late accretion impacts may have killed off life on our planet as late as 3.8 x 10(9) years ago. This leaves only 300 million years to go from the prebiotic soup to the RNA world and to cyanobacteria. However, 300 million years should be more than sufficient time. All known prebiotic reactions take place in geologically rapid time scales, and very slow prebiotic reactions are not feasible because the intermediate compounds would have been destroyed due to the passage of the entire ocean through deep-sea vents every 10(7) years or in even less time. Therefore, it is likely that self-replicating systems capable of undergoing Darwinian evolution emerged in a period shorter than the destruction rates of its components (<5 million years). The time for evolution from the first DNA/protein organisms to cyanobacteria is usually thought to be very long. However, the similarities of many enzymatic reactions, together with the analysis of the available sequence data, suggest that a significant number of the components involved in basic biological processes are the result of ancient gene duplication events. Assuming that the rate of gene duplication of ancient prokaryotes was comparable to today's present values, the development of a filamentous cyanobacterial-like genome would require approximately 7 x 10(6) years--or perhaps much less. Thus, in spite of the many uncertainties involved in the estimates of time for life to arise and evolve to cyanobacteria, we see no compelling reason to assume that this process, from the beginning of the primitive soup to cyanobacteria, took more than 10 million years.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEvolution, ChemicalEvolution, MolecularOrigin of LifeCyanobacteriaMultigene FamilyPhotosynthesisProtein BiosynthesisRNARNA, CatalyticSeawaterTime FactorsRNARNA, CatalyticNASA Discipline ExobiologyNon-NASA Center

Identifiers

PMID11536653
OpenAlexW2063530045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.