Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11535836›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Plant gene expression response to Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

R F Ditt, E W Nester, L Comai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. MKK4/5-MPK3/6 Cascade RegulatesFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Biolistic Approach for Transient Gene Expression Studies in Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Host Factors in the Infection Cycle ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F DittDepartment of Botany, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5325, USA.
E W Nester
L Comai
University of Washington · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF CROWN GALL TUMORIGENESISR01GM032618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NESTER, EUGENE W · 1985 to 2005
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32618NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To elucidate the nature of plant response to infection and transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, we compared the cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) pattern of Agrobacterium- and mock-inoculated Ageratum conyzoides plant cell cultures. From 16,000 cDNA fragments analyzed, 251 (1.6%) were differentially regulated (0.5% down-regulated) 48 h after cocultivation with Agrobacterium. From 75 strongly regulated fragments, 56 were already regulated 24 h after cocultivation. Sequence similarities were obtained for 20 of these fragments, and reverse transcription-PCR analysis was carried out with seven to confirm their cDNA-AFLP differential pattern. Their sequence similarities suggest a role for these genes in signal perception, transduction, and plant defense. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis indicated that four genes involved in defense response are regulated in a similar manner by nonpathogenic bacteria, whereas one gene putatively involved in signal transduction appeared to respond more strongly to Agrobacterium. A nodulin-like gene was regulated only by Agrobacterium. These results demonstrate a rapid plant cell response to Agrobacterium infection, which overlaps a general response to bacteria but also has Agrobacterium-specific features.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantAgrobacterium tumefaciensAsteraceaeBase SequenceCells, CulturedDNA FragmentationDNA, PlantGene Expression ProfilingMolecular Sequence DataNicotianaPlants, ToxicReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTime FactorsTransformation, GeneticDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID11535836
PMCPMC58580
OpenAlexW2017559931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.