Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11533232›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2001

A novel upstream RNA polymerase III promoter element becomes essential when the chromatin structure of the yeast U6 RNA gene is altered.

M P Martin, V L Gerlach, D A Brow

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A single-stranded promoter for RNA polymerase III.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M P MartinDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1532, USA.
V L Gerlach
D A Brow
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
U6 RNA GENE TRANSCRIPTION COMPLEXR01GM044665 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BROW, DAVID A · 1990 to 2002
$663k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM07215NIGMS NIH HHS GM44665NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044665NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae U6 RNA gene, SNR6, possesses upstream sequences that allow productive binding in vitro of the RNA polymerase III (Pol III) transcription initiation factor IIIB (TFIIIB) in the absence of TFIIIC or other assembly factors. TFIIIC-independent transcription of SNR6 in vitro is highly sensitive to point mutations in a consensus TATA box at position -30. In contrast, the TATA box is dispensable for SNR6 transcription in vivo, apparently because TFIIIC bound to the intragenic A block and downstream B block can recruit TFIIIB via protein-protein interactions. A mutant allele of SNR6 with decreased spacing between the A and B blocks, snr6-Delta42, exhibits increased dependence on the upstream sequences in vivo. Unexpectedly, we find that in vivo expression of snr6-Delta42 is much more sensitive to mutations in a (dT-dA)(7) tract between the TATA box and transcription start site than to mutations in the TATA box itself. Inversion of single base pairs in the center of the dT-dA tract nearly abolishes transcription of snr6-Delta42, yet inversion of all 7 base pairs has little effect on expression, indicating that the dA-dT tract is relatively orientation independent. Although it is within the TFIIIB footprint, point mutations in the dT-dA tract do not inhibit TFIIIB binding or TFIIIC-independent transcription of SNR6 in vitro. In the absence of the chromatin architectural protein Nhp6, dT-dA tract mutations are lethal even when A-to-B block spacing is wild type. We conclude that the (dT-dA)(7) tract and Nhp6 cooperate to direct productive transcription complex assembly on SNR6 in vivo.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAT Rich SequenceChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsGenes, FungalHMGN ProteinsMutationNuclear ProteinsResponse ElementsRNA Polymerase IIIRNA, Small NuclearSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTATA BoxTranscription FactorsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsHMGN ProteinsNHP6A protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIIRNA, Small NuclearSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors, TFIIITranscription Factor TFIIIBTranscription Factor TFIIICU6 small nuclear RNA

Identifiers

PMID11533232
PMCPMC99790
OpenAlexW2114119508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.