Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11532825›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

A key medical decision maker: the patient.

R A Deyo

Abstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Influence of decision aids on patient preferences for anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2007
    Trial
  3. The need for tailored ethical guidelines in HIV/AIDS care.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting preferences: a neglected aspect of shared decision-making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2006
    Review
  14. Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2006
    Article
  15. Patient safety: what about the patient?Quality & safety in health care · 2002
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Article
  18. Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off?Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R A Deyo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Making, Computer-AssistedHumansInformation ServicesPatient ParticipationHealth Care and Public Health

Identifiers

PMID11532825
PMCPMC1121067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.