Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11532213›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2001

Comparison of complete nuclear receptor sets from the human, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila genomes.

J M Maglich, A Sluder, X Guan, Y Shi, D D McKee, K Carrick, K Kamdar, T M Willson, J T Moore

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Insect Sterols and Steroids.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcriptome Analysis of the NematodeFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J M MaglichNuclear Receptor Discovery Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
A Sluder
X Guan
Y Shi
D D McKee
K Carrick
K Kamdar
T M Willson
J T Moore
GlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USSyngenta (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of complete genome sequences enables all the members of a gene family to be identified without limitations imposed by temporal, spatial or quantitative aspects of mRNA expression. Using the nearly completed human genome sequence, we combined in silico and experimental approaches to define the complete human nuclear receptor (NR) set. This information was used to carry out a comparative genomic study of the NR superfamily.

resultsOur analysis of the human genome identified two novel NR sequences. Both these contained stop codons within the coding regions, indicating that both are pseudogenes. One (HNF4 gamma-related) contained no introns and expressed no detectable mRNA, whereas the other (FXR-related) produced mRNA at relatively high levels in testis. If translated, the latter is predicted to encode a short, non-functional protein. Our analysis indicates that there are fewer than 50 functional human NRs, dramatically fewer than in Caenorhabditis elegans and about twice as many as in Drosophila. Using the complete human NR set we made comparisons with the NR sets of C. elegans and Drosophila. Searches for the >200 NRs unique to C. elegans revealed no human homologs. The comparative analysis also revealed a Drosophila member of NR subfamily NR3, confirming an ancient metazoan origin for this subfamily.

conclusionsThis work provides the basis for new insights into the evolution and functional relationships of NR superfamily members.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenes, HelminthGenes, InsectGenomicsHumansIntronsMolecular Sequence DataCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID11532213
PMCPMC55326
OpenAlexW2148217900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.