Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11531048›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2001

Unsafe injection practices in a cohort of injection drug users in Vancouver: could safer injecting rooms help?

E Wood, M W Tyndall, P M Spittal, K Li, T Kerr, R S Hogg, J S Montaner, M V O'Shaughnessy, M T Schechter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of PSTD on service access among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

E WoodBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
M W Tyndall
P M Spittal
K Li
T Kerr
R S Hogg
J S Montaner
M V O'Shaughnessy
M T Schechter

Funding

SYRINGE ACCESS AND RISK FACTORS ON HIV TRANSMISSIONR01DA011591 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI KERR, THOMAS · 1998 to 2014
$5.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011591NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA11591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn several European countries safer injecting rooms have reduced the public disorder and health-related problems of injection drug use. We explored factors associated with needle-sharing practices that could potentially be alleviated by the availability of safer injecting rooms in Canada.

methodsThe Vancouver Injection Drug User Study is a prospective cohort study of injection drug users (IDUs) that began in 1996. The analyses reported here were restricted to the 776 participants who reported actively injecting drugs in the 6 months before the most recent follow-up visit, during the period January 1999 to October 2000. Needle sharing was defined as either borrowing or lending a used needle in the 6-month period before the interview.

resultsOverall, 214 (27.6%) of the participants reported sharing needles during the 6 months before follow-up; 106 (13.7%) injected drugs in public, and 581 (74.9%) reported injecting alone at least once. Variables independently associated with needle sharing in a multivariate analysis included difficulty getting sterile needles (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.1), requiring help to inject drugs (adjusted OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8), needle reuse (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6), frequent cocaine injection (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3) and frequent heroin injection (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.04-2.1). Conversely, HIV-positive participants were less likely to share needles (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.8), although 20.2% of the HIV-positive IDUs still reported sharing needles.

interpretationDespite the availability of a large needle-exchange program and targeted law enforcement efforts in Vancouver, needle sharing remains an alarmingly common practice in our cohort. We identified a number of risk behaviours--difficulty getting sterile needles, needle sharing and reuse, injection of drugs in public and injecting alone (one of the main contributing causes of overdose)--that may be alleviated by the establishment of supervised safer injecting rooms.

Indexed as

CocaineHeroinSubstance Abuse, IntravenousBritish ColumbiaDrug OverdoseEducational StatusFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeedle SharingPreventive Health ServicesProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationCocaineHeroin

Identifiers

PMID11531048
PMCPMC81364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.