Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11528480›Full record

ArticleNature2001

Virus-mediated killing of cells that lack p53 activity.

K Raj, P Ogston, P Beard

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Allele-specific depletion ofMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gene therapy for liver diseases - progress and challenges.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  13. Nuclear entry and egress of parvoviruses.Molecular microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tissue and cell-type-specific transduction using rAAV vectors in lung diseases.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K RajSwiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), Epalinges, Switzerland.
P Ogston
P Beard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of molecular oncology is to identify means to kill cells lacking p53 function. Most current cancer therapy is based on damaging cellular DNA by irradiation or chemicals. Recent reports support the notion that, in the event of DNA damage, the p53 tumour-suppressor protein is able to prevent cell death by sustaining an arrest of the cell cycle at the G2 phase. We report here that adeno-associated virus (AAV) selectively induces apoptosis in cells that lack active p53. Cells with intact p53 activity are not killed but undergo arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. This arrest is characterized by an increase in p53 activity and p21 levels and by the targeted destruction of CDC25C. Neither cell killing nor arrest depends upon AAV-encoded proteins. Rather, AAV DNA, which is single-stranded with hairpin structures at both ends, elicits in cells a DNA damage response that, in the absence of active p53, leads to cell death. AAV inhibits tumour growth in mice. Thus viruses can be used to deliver DNA of unusual structure into cells to trigger a DNA damage response without damaging cellular DNA and to selectively eliminate those cells lacking p53 activity.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell CycleDependovirusDNA DamageDNA, ViralEtoposideG2 PhaseHumansTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Suppressor Protein p53Viral ProteinsDNA, ViralEtoposideTumor Suppressor Protein p53Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11528480
OpenAlexW1621865896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.