Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11526471›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2001

Mapping susceptibility genes for bipolar disorder: a pharmacogenetic approach based on excellent response to lithium.

G Turecki, P Grof, E Grof, V D'Souza, L Lebuis, C Marineau, P Cavazzoni, A Duffy, C Bétard, P Zvolský and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A novel knockout mouse for the small EDRK-rich factor 2 (Serf2) showing developmental and other deficits.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Do the Trajectories of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Follow a Universal Staging Model?Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Toward a comprehensive clinical staging model for bipolar disorder: integrating the evidence.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014
    Review
  19. Clinical utility gene card for: 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014
    Article
  20. Molecular actions and clinical pharmacogenetics of lithium therapy.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

G TureckiDouglas Hospital Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
P Grof
E Grof
V D'Souza
L Lebuis
C Marineau
P Cavazzoni
A Duffy
C Bétard
P Zvolský
C Robertson
C Brewer
T J Hudson
G A Rouleau
M Alda
University of Ottawa · CADouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill Genome Centre · CACharles University · CZRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic mapping studies in bipolar disorder (BD) have been hampered by the unclear boundaries of the phenotypic spectrum, and possibly, by the complexity of the underlying genetic mechanisms, and heterogeneity. Among the suggested approaches to circumvent these problems, a pharmacogenetic strategy has been increasingly proposed. Several studies have indicated that patients with BD who respond well to lithium prophylaxis constitute a biologically distinct subgroup. In this study we have conducted a complete genome scan using 378 markers spaced at an average distance of 10 cM in 31 families ascertained through excellent lithium responders. Response to lithium was evaluated prospectively with an average follow-up of 12 years. Evidence for linkage was found with a locus on chromosome 15q14 (ACTC, lod score = 3.46, locus-specific P-value = 0.000014) and suggestive results were observed for another marker on chromosome 7q11.2 (D7S1816, lod score = 2.68, locus-specific P-value = 0.00011). Other interesting findings were obtained with markers on chromosomes 6 and 22, namely D6S1050 (lod score = 2.0, locus-specific P-value = 0.00004) and D22S420 (lod score = 1.91). Nonparametric linkage analysis provided additional support for the role of these loci. Further analyses of these results suggested that the locus on chromosome 15q14 may be implicated in the etiology of BD, whereas the 7q11.2 locus may be relevant for lithium response. In conclusion, our results provide original evidence suggesting that loci on 15q14 and 7q11.2 may be implicated in the pathogenesis of BD responsive to lithium.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 15Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAge of OnsetAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenome, HumanHumansAntimanic AgentsGenetic MarkersLithium

Identifiers

PMID11526471
OpenAlexW2024539842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.