Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11526187›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Multicenter proficiency testing of nucleic acid amplification methods for the detection of enteroviruses.

K E Van Vliet, P Muir, J M Echevarria, P E Klapper, G M Cleator, A M Van Loon

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards multitarget testing in molecular microbiology.International journal of microbiology · 2013
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Currently used nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of viruses and atypicals in acute respiratory infections.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2007
    Review
  8. Multicenter beta trial of the GeneXpert enterovirus assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2007
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular and diagnostic clinical virology in real time.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2004
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical virology in real time.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2002
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K E Van VlietDepartment of Virology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P Muir
J M Echevarria
P E Klapper
G M Cleator
A M Van Loon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multicenter study of molecular detection of enteroviruses was conducted using a proficiency panel. Of 70 data sets, 46 (66%) reported correct results for samples containing at least 1 50% infective dose per ml and for negative samples. Variation in performance between laboratories demonstrates the need for ongoing quality control.

Indexed as

EnterovirusEnterovirus InfectionsHumansLaboratoriesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesQuality ControlRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID11526187
PMCPMC88355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.