Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11526172›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection.

W J Mason, J S Blevins, K Beenken, N Wibowo, N Ojha, M S Smeltzer

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Comparison ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization and pathogenicity of multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates in chickens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Resistance profile and biofilm production of Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus sp., and Streptococcus spp. from dairy farms in southern Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

W J MasonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
J S Blevins
K Beenken
N Wibowo
N Ojha
M S Smeltzer
Bipar · FRUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Indonesia · ID

Funding

ADHESINS AND STAPHYLOCOCCAL OSTEOMYELITISR29AI037729 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MED SCIS LTL ROCK · PI SMELTZER, MARK S · 1996 to 2000
$111k
NIAID NIH HHS R29-AI37729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the development of a multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. The protocol was designed to (i) detect any staphylococcal species to the exclusion of other bacterial pathogens (based on primers corresponding to Staphylococcus-specific regions of the 16S rRNA genes), (ii) distinguish between S. aureus and the coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (based on amplification of the S. aureus-specific clfA gene), and (iii) provide an indication of the likelihood that the staphylococci present in the specimen are resistant to oxacillin (based on amplification of the mecA gene). The expected fragments were amplified from each of 60 staphylococcal isolates (13 oxacillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, 23 oxacillin-sensitive S. aureus isolates, 17 oxacillin-resistant CNS, and 7 oxacillin-sensitive CNS). No amplification products were observed with template DNA from nonstaphylococcal species, and the efficiency of amplification of staphylococcal targets was not adversely affected by the presence of DNA from other bacterial species in the same sample. The utility of the protocol for the analysis of clinical samples was verified by analysis of aliquots taken directly from BacT/Alert blood culture bottles. Of 77 blood cultures tested, only 7 yielded results inconsistent with those of conventional methods of diagnosis and susceptibility testing. Of those, one was identified as a CNS species by PCR and S. aureus by conventional methods. We also identified two isolates that were mecA positive but were oxacillin sensitive according to conventional methods. The other four samples failed to yield any amplification product even with a control set of primers corresponding to a conserved region of the eubacterial rRNA genes.

Indexed as

BloodCulture MediaDNA PrimersGenes, rRNAHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusCulture MediaDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID11526172
PMCPMC88340
OpenAlexW2039121393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.