ArticleBiochemistry2001
Contribution of aromatic-aromatic interactions to the anomalous pK(a) of tyrosine-9 and the C-terminal dynamics of glutathione S-transferase A1-1.
Article in Biochemistry, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct observation of negative cooperativity in a detoxification enzyme at the atomic level by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectroscopy and simulation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Carbonic anhydrase modification for carbon management.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Enzymatic detoxication, conformational selection, and the role of molten globule active sites.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Fluorescence anisotropy of tyrosinate anion using one-, two- and three-photon excitation: tyrosinate anion fluorescence.Journal of fluorescence · 2013Article
- Ensemble perspective for catalytic promiscuity: calorimetric analysis of the active site conformational landscape of a detoxification enzyme.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- Interactions of glutathione transferases with 4-hydroxynonenal.Drug metabolism reviews · 2011Review
- Substrate specificity combined with stereopromiscuity in glutathione transferase A4-4-dependent metabolism of 4-hydroxynonenal.Biochemistry · 2010Article
- Structural analysis of a glutathione transferase A1-1 mutant tailored for high catalytic efficiency with toxic alkenals.Biochemistry · 2009Article
- The anomalous pKa of Tyr-9 in glutathione S-transferase A1-1 catalyzes product release.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most cytosolic glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) exploit a hydrogen bond between an active site Tyr and the bound glutathione (GSH) cofactor to lower the pK(a) of the GSH and generate the nucleophilic thiolate anion, GS(-). In human (hGSTA1-1) and rat (rGSTA1-1) homologues, the active site Tyr-9 has a low pK(a) of 8.1-8.3, for which the functional significance is unknown. Crystal structures of GSTA1-1 suggest that weakly polar interactions between the electropositive ring edge of Phe-10 and the pi-cloud of Tyr-9, in the apoenzyme, could stabilize the tyrosinate anion and also modulate the pK(a) of GSH. Upon binding a product GSH conjugate, Phe-10 moves away from Tyr-9, allowing the highly dynamic C-terminus to "close" over the active site. To explore the role of Phe-10 in modulating the Tyr-9 pK(a) and in ligand binding, rGSTA1-1 mutants F10Y, F10L, and F10A were characterized. The pK(a)s of Tyr-9 in the apoenzymes were 8.2 +/- 0.2, 8.7 +/- 0.2, and 9.3 +/- 0.1, respectively, for F10Y, F10L, and F10A, compared to 8.3 +/- 0.2 for the "wild type". The experimentally determined pK(a)s qualitatively paralleled the energies required to remove a proton predicted by ab initio calculations using model compounds constrained to the coordinates of rGSTA1-1. The pK(a) of GSH in the binary complex was significantly less affected by these substitutions. In contrast, F220I and F220Y C-terminal mutations caused the pK(a) of Tyr-9 to decrease modestly. For the binary complex with S-hexyl-GSH, which induces the "closed" conformation, Tyr-9 retains a low pK(a) and the Phe-10 substitutions have significant effects. Presumably, Phe-10 plays a critical structural role in stabilizing the closed conformation. The mutations F10L and F10A also slowed the rate of GSH conjugate binding by 10-20-fold, as measured by stopped-flow fluorescence. The effects of Phe-10 substitution were large for both steps of the biphasic binding reaction, suggesting the importance of aromatic interactions throughout the reaction coordinate. A unified view of the C-terminal dynamics of GSTA1-1 is discussed, which emphasizes the coupling between Tyr-9 ionization, active site solvation, and C-terminal dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.