Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11520382›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2001

Doctor discontent. A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997.

A Murray, J E Montgomery, H Chang, W H Rogers, T Inui, D G Safran

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Job satisfaction among family medicine physicians in Saudi Arabia.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving modern cancer care through information technology.American journal of preventive medicine · 2011
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Building physician resilience.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A MurrayUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. amurray@ucalgary.ca
J E Montgomery
H Chang
W H Rogers
T Inui
D G Safran

Funding

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS &PRIMARY CARE PERFORMANCER01HS008841 · AHRQ · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAFRAN, DANA GELB · 1995 to 1997
–
AHRQ HHS R01 HS08841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the differences in physician satisfaction associated with open- versus closed-model practice settings and to evaluate changes in physician satisfaction between 1986 and 1997. Open-model practices refer to those in which physicians accept patients from multiple health plans and insurers (i.e., do not have an exclusive arrangement with any single health plan). Closed-model practices refer to those wherein physicians have an exclusive relationship with a single health plan (i.e., staff- or group-model HMO).

designTwo cross-sectional surveys of physicians; one conducted in 1986 (Medical Outcomes Study) and one conducted in 1997 (Study of Primary Care Performance in Massachusetts).

settingPrimary care practices in Massachusetts.

participantsGeneral internists and family practitioners in Massachusetts. MEASUREMENTS: Seven measures of physician satisfaction, including satisfaction with quality of care, the potential to achieve professional goals, time spent with individual patients, total earnings from practice, degree of personal autonomy, leisure time, and incentives for high quality.

resultsPhysicians in open- versus closed-model practices differed significantly in several aspects of their professional satisfaction. In 1997, open-model physicians were less satisfied than closed-model physicians with their total earnings, leisure time, and incentives for high quality. Open-model physicians reported significantly more difficulty with authorization procedures and reported more denials for care. Overall, physicians in 1997 were less satisfied in every aspect of their professional life than 1986 physicians. Differences were significant in three areas: time spent with individual patients, autonomy, and leisure time (P < or =.05). Among open-model physicians, satisfaction with autonomy and time with individual patients were significantly lower in 1997 than 1986 (P < or =.01). Among closed-model physicians, satisfaction with total earnings and with potential to achieve professional goals were significantly lower in 1997 than in 1986 (P < or =.01).

conclusionsThis study finds that the state of physician satisfaction in Massachusetts is extremely low, with the majority of physicians dissatisfied with the amount of time they have with individual patients, their leisure time, and their incentives for high quality. Satisfaction with most areas of practice declined significantly between 1986 and 1997. Open-model physicians were less satisfied than closed-model physicians in most aspects of practices.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelJob SatisfactionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Private Practice

Identifiers

PMID11520382
PMCPMC1495236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.