ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2001
Absence of germline and somatic p53 alterations in children with sporadic brain tumors.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism on glioma susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Metabolic rewiring in MYC-driven medulloblastoma by BET-bromodomain inhibition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and glioma risk: A meta-analysis.Oncology letters · 2012Article
- Inherited predisposition to glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2010Review
- PI3K pathway regulates survival of cancer stem cells residing in the perivascular niche following radiation in medulloblastoma in vivo.Genes & development · 2008Article
- Genetic and expression profiles of cerebellar liponeurocytomas.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancers of the central nervous system are the most common solid tumors of childhood. Although somatic alterations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene have been implicated in brain tumorigenesis, the role of germline p53 mutations in the development of childhood brain tumors has not been well defined. As a component of an ongoing extensive study of the epidemiology of childhood brain tumors, we prospectively examined the germline and tumor p53 gene status in 85 children without a family history of cancer who were diagnosed with a sporadic malignant central nervous system tumor. Using PCR/single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis and direct DNA sequencing, 85 children were screened for the presence of constitutional p53 sequence alterations in exons 2 and 4 through 11. No mutations were identified. Commonly reported sequence polymorphisms were observed at codon 72, as well as in 2 other previously described nucleotide residues. Forty-four brain tumor samples were available for analysis and of these 40 were paired with peripheral blood. Once again, no p53 mutations were found. Of the 5 germline samples with the 2 common polymorphisms, only one had a paired tumor sample for comparison and the tumor contained the same alteration as the germline. Of note, one tumor, a PNET of the cerebellum (medulloblastoma), showed loss of heterozygosity at codon 72. We can conclude that the frequency of germline and somatic p53 mutations in sporadic childhood brain tumors is very low, probably less than 1%, and there is no need to screen these patients routinely for their germline p53 status. However, the potential significance of LOH at codon 72 remains to be elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.