Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11519290›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2001

Systemic antifungal agents.

W Abuhammour, E Habte-Gabr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genital-oral transmission ofInternational journal of STD & AIDS · 2025
    Article
  2. The Preliminary Analysis of Flavonoids in the Petals ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Newer antifungal agents.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W AbuhammourDepartment of Pediatrics, Hurley Medical Centre, Michigan State University-College of Human Medicine, Flint, Michigan, USA. wabuham1@hurleymc.com
E Habte-Gabr
Hurley Medical Center · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-fungal agents are classified under two major headings, systematic and topical agents. Only systematic anti-fungal agents will be discussed in this chapter. Since the discovery in 1955, amphotericin B has been the cornerstone of anti-fungal treatment. It is active against most species of fungi. However, Candida lusitaniae, Pseudallescheria boydii, and fusarium spp have primary resistance to amphotericin B. Recently, new liposomal preparations of amphotericin B have been developed. They are less nephrotoxic. The azole family of anti-fungal includes two broad classes: the imidazoles (clotrimazote, ketoconazote, miconazole) and the triazoles (flucouazole and itracouazole). Imidazoles are still widely used for the treatment of superficial mycoses and vaginal candidiasis. The systematic triazoles are more slowly metabolized and have less effect on human synthesis than imidazoles, hence they are preferred for systemic therapy. Flucytosine is a fluorinated pyrimidine. Clinically, the principal use of flucytosine is as adjunctive therapy with amphotericin B in the treatment of candidial or cryptococcal diseases, Griseofuluin is derived from penicillium. It is fungistatic in vitro for species of dermatophytes. It is useful for the treatment of tinea capitis and tinea unginum.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntifungal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleMycosesSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID11519290
OpenAlexW2275711947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.