Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11519238›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of managed care2001

A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs.

D Brooten, J M Youngblut, L Brown, S A Finkler, D F Neff, E Madigan

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of managed care, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Economic Evaluation of Prenatal and Postpartum Care in Women With Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cost-effectiveness of controlling gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Comparing mothers' postpartum concerns in two clinical trials 18 years apart.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · 2016
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D BrootenCase Western Reserve University School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH, USA. d.brooten@theresearchateam.com
J M Youngblut
L Brown
S A Finkler
D F Neff
E Madigan
A-Team (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

NURSE HOME CARE-HIGH RISK PREGNANT WOMENR01NR002867 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BROOTEN, DOROTHY · 1991 to 1995
–
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR002867NINR NIH HHS R01 NR02897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine prenatal, maternal, and infant outcomes and costs through 1 year after delivery using a model of prenatal care for women at high risk of delivering low-birth-weight infants in which half of the prenatal care was provided in women's homes by nurse specialists with master's degrees. STUDY

designRandomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND

methodsA sample of 173 women (and 194 infants) with high-risk pregnancies (gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, preterm labor, or high risk of preterm labor) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (85 women and 94 infants) or the control group (88 women and 100 infants). Control women received usual prenatal care. Intervention women received half of their prenatal care in their homes, with teaching, counseling, telephone outreach, daily telephone availability, and a postpartum home visit by nurse specialists with physician backup.

resultsFor the full sample, mean maternal age was 27 years; 85.5% of women were single mothers, 36.4% had less than a high school education, 93.6% were African American, and 93.6% had public health insurance, with no differences between groups on these variables. The intervention group had lower fetal/infant mortality vs the control group (2 vs 9), 11 fewer preterm infants, more twin pregnancies carried to term (77.7% vs 33.3%), fewer prenatal hospitalizations (41 vs 49), fewer infant rehospitalizations (18 vs 24), and a savings of more than 750 total hospital days and $2,496,145 [corrected].

conclusionThis model of care provides a reasoned solution to improving pregnancy and infant outcomes while reducing healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHome Care ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancy, High-RiskAdultFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornModels, OrganizationalNurse CliniciansPhiladelphiaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID11519238
PMCPMC3544939
OpenAlexW1559722529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.