ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2001
The privacy paradox: laying Orwell's ghost to rest.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in accessing routinely collected data from multiple providers in the UK for primary studies: Managing the morass.International journal of population data science · 2018Article
- Ensuring Privacy When Integrating Patient-Based Datasets: New Methods and Developments in Record Linkage.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- How strong are passwords used to protect personal health information in clinical trials?Journal of medical Internet research · 2011Article
- Data protection and the promotion of health research.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2007Article
- Feasibility of a patient decision aid regarding disclosure of personal health information: qualitative evaluation of the Health Care Information Directive.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2004Article
- Paying the PIPEDA.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Article
- Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11517649PMC81333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.