Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11517308›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

DNA repair of a single UV photoproduct in a designed nucleosome.

J V Kosmoski, E J Ackerman, M J Smerdon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Recurrent Noncoding Mutations in Skin Cancers: UV Damage Susceptibility or Repair Inhibition as Primary Driver?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. UV-Induced DNA Damage and Mutagenesis in Chromatin.Photochemistry and photobiology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Platinum anticancer drug damage enforces a particular rotational setting of DNA in nucleosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J V KosmoskiBiochemistry and Biophysics, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4660, USA.
E J Ackerman
M J Smerdon
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USWashington State University · US

Funding

DNA REPAIR IN A HORMONE-RESPONSIVE GENER01ES004106 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMERDON, MICHAEL J · 1986 to 2014
$4.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES04106NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES004106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic DNA repair enzymes must interact with the architectural hierarchy of chromatin. The challenge of finding damaged DNA complexed with histone proteins in nucleosomes is complicated by the need to maintain local chromatin structures involved in regulating other DNA processing events. The heterogeneity of lesions induced by DNA-damaging agents has led us to design homogeneously damaged substrates to directly compare repair of naked DNA with that of nucleosomes. Here we report that nucleotide excision repair in Xenopus nuclear extracts can effectively repair a single UV radiation photoproduct located 5 bases from the dyad center of a positioned nucleosome, although the nucleosome is repaired at about half the rate at which the naked DNA fragment is. Extract repair within the nucleosome is >50-fold more rapid than either enzymatic photoreversal or endonuclease cleavage of the lesion in vitro. Furthermore, nucleosome formation occurs (after repair) only on damaged naked DNA (165-bp fragments) during a 1-h incubation in these extracts, even in the presence of a large excess of undamaged DNA. This is an example of selective nucleosome assembly by Xenopus nuclear extracts on a short linear DNA fragment containing a DNA lesion.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsBase SequenceDNA DamageDNA LigasesFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesNucleosomesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPhotochemistryUltraviolet RaysXenopusDNA LigasesNucleosomesOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID11517308
PMCPMC56924
OpenAlexW2133912744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.