Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11511553›Full record

ArticleGut2001

Inverse background of Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen in reflux oesophagitis compared with gastric cancer: analysis of 5732 Japanese subjects.

Y Yamaji, T Mitsushima, H Ikuma, M Okamoto, H Yoshida, T Kawabe, Y Shiratori, K Saito, K Yokouchi, M Omata

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Randomized controlled trial comparing gastric cancer screening by gastrointestinal X-ray with serology for Helicobacter pylori and pepsinogens followed by gastrointestinal endoscopy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2015
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and validation of a relatively accurate gastric cancer high-risk group screening scoring system in urban residents.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  8. Risk assessment of metachronous gastric cancer development using OLGA and OLGIM systems after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Evaluation of polygenic risk score for risk prediction of gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  10. Serum pepsinogen level as a biomarker for atrophy, reflux esophagitis, and gastric cancer screening in Indonesia.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Screening for gastric cancer in China: Advances, challenges and visions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The new modified ABCD method for gastric neoplasm screening.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y YamajiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. yamaji-tky@umin.ac.jp
T Mitsushima
H Ikuma
M Okamoto
H Yoshida
T Kawabe
Y Shiratori
K Saito
K Yokouchi
M Omata
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux oesophagitis remains controversial.

aimsTo evaluate the relationship between H pylori and reflux oesophagitis in a large number of Japanese subjects. SUBJECTS: A total of 5732 consecutive Japanese subjects during a health screening were enrolled.

methodsGastrointestinal endoscopy was performed on all subjects. We simultaneously measured serum anti-H pylori antibody and pepsinogen as markers of H pylori infection together with gastric atrophy. The risk of reflux oesophagitis was evaluated in relation to these markers, and the results were compared with those of gastric cancer.

resultsReflux oesophagitis was found in 108 subjects. Both positivity for H pylori antibody (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.45-1.0)) and "low" pepsinogen indicating gastric atrophy (OR 0.35 (0.18-0.68)) were negatively associated with reflux oesophagitis. After subjects were classified into four groups based on positivity or negativity for H pylori antibody and "low" pepsinogen, the prevalence of reflux oesophagitis showed a decreasing trend as H pylori induced gastric atrophy became more severe. The risk of gastric cancer showed an increasing trend, exactly the opposite to that of reflux oesophagitis.

conclusionsAnalysis of a large series of Japanese subjects revealed a decreasing prevalence of reflux oesophagitis in conjunction with progress of gastric atrophy induced by H pylori infection. This pattern was completely opposite to that of gastric cancer cases. A protective role of H pylori for reflux oesophagitis through the development of gastric atrophy has been suggested.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceAntibodies, BacterialBiomarkersConfidence IntervalsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEsophagitis, PepticFemaleGastritis, AtrophicHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, BacterialBiomarkersPepsinogen A

Identifiers

PMID11511553
PMCPMC1728449
OpenAlexW2122011242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.