Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11509941›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2001

Evaluation of the Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in recipients of an allogeneic stem cell transplant.

H Hebart, P Wuchter, J Loeffler, B Gscheidle, K Hamprecht, C Sinzger, G Jahn, K Dietz, L Kanz, H Einsele

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H HebartMedizinische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Abteilung II, Tübingen, Germany.
P Wuchter
J Loeffler
B Gscheidle
K Hamprecht
C Sinzger
G Jahn
K Dietz
L Kanz
H Einsele
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis of CMV infection based on sensitive diagnostic assays has helped to reduce CMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this study, the commercialized Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) (HCS) was prospectively compared to an in-house CMV-DNA PCR assay from whole blood in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Overall, a high concordance between HCS and PCR was documented (kappa = 0.686; n = 385). The HCS assay was found to be as sensitive as the PCR indicating active CMV infection at a median of 35 and 34 days after transplantation, respectively. None of the HCS-negative patients developed CMV-related symptoms (negative predictive value 100%). Declining CMV DNA load in the blood was found to be an indicator for effective antiviral therapy, whereas persistence of a high viral load was associated with fatal CMV disease. In conclusion, the Hybrid Capture CMV DNA assay (v 2.0) allows early diagnosis of CMV infection after allogeneic SCT and assessment of the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultBusulfanCells, CulturedCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralFemaleFibroblastsHistocompatibility TestingHumansImmunosuppression TherapyLeukemiaLymphocyte DepletionBusulfanDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID11509941
OpenAlexW2330123230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.