Trial reportHealth services research2001
The effect of neighborhood-based community organizing: results from the Seattle Minority Youth Health Project.
Trial report in Health services research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for prevention of drug use by young people delivered in non-school settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.American journal of public health · 2003Pooled it
- Characterizing asset-based studies in public health: development of a framework.Health promotion international · 2023Article
- Implementation Facilitators and Challenges of a Place-Based Intervention to Reduce Health Disparities in Harlem Through Community Activation and Mobilization.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Neighborhood cohesion and daily well-being: results from a diary study.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2013Article
- Social capital, acculturation, mental health, and perceived access to services among Mexican American women.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2012Article
- Community organizing goes to college: a practice-based model to implement environmental strategies to reduce high-risk drinking on college campuses.Health promotion practice · 2010Article
- Building on leadership and social capital to create change in 2 urban communities.American journal of public health · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of a community mobilization and youth development strategy to prevent drug abuse, violence, and risky sexual activity. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
settingPrimary surveys of youth, parents, and key neighborhood leaders were carried out at baseline (1994) and at the end of the intervention period (1997). The study took place in four intervention and six control neighborhoods in Seattle. STUDY
designThe study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with neighborhood as the unit of randomization. The intervention consisted of a paid community organizer in each neighborhood who recruited a group of residents to serve as a community action board. Key variables included perceptions of neighborhood mobilization by youth, parents, and key neighborhood leaders. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
methodsYouth surveys were self-administered during school hours. Parent and neighborhood leader surveys were conducted over the phone by trained interviewers. PRINCIPAL
findingsSurvey results showed that mobilization increased to the same degree in both intervention and control neighborhoods with no evidence of an overall intervention effect. There did appear to be a relative increase in mobilization in the neighborhood with the highest level of intervention activity.
conclusionThis randomized study failed to demonstrate a measurable effect for a community mobilization intervention. It is uncertain whether the negative finding was because of a lack of strength of the interventions or problems detecting intervention effects using individual-level closed-end surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11508634PMC1089251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.