Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11504573›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2001

Complications of oral antiplatelet medications.

E Van De Graaff, S R Steinhubl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Van De GraaffDepartment of Cardiology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, Lackland AFB, TX 78236, USA. steinhubl@sprintmail.com
S R Steinhubl
Wilford Hall Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One by-product of the flurry of large-scale clinical trials accompanying the emergence of drugs that inhibit platelet function is volumes of information chronicling the adverse effects of this class of medications. One aspect all antiplatelet drugs share is a propensity toward bleeding. Beyond that similarity, however, the different pharmacologic agents in this broad collection have few attributes in common. Aspirin, by virtue of its long history, has been studied most extensively, and has proven to be an exceptionally valuable therapy. However, the complicated adverse profile of this seemingly simple drug is commonly overlooked by practitioners and deserves clinical review. The thienopyridine class (including ticlopidine and clopidogrel) share certain peculiarities that continue to be clarified, including life-threatening thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura. Dipyridamole is a veteran drug that is enjoying renewed attention as a prophylactic aid in preventing cerebrovascular events. One class, the oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, has failed to find its way into clinical implementation due to an unfavorable balance between efficacy and adverse effect. This review summarizes the adverse profiles of each of these drug classes and draws on data gathered in large clinical studies.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAspirinClinical Trials as TopicClopidogrelDipyridamoleHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexTiclopidineAspirinClopidogrelDipyridamolePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID11504573
OpenAlexW2059602802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.