Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001
Pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin after single and multiple doses.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001Trial
- Drug interactions with clinafloxacin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001Trial
- Identification of FDA-Approved Drugs with Activity against Stationary PhaseAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Clinafloxacin for Treatment of Burkholderia cenocepacia Infection in a Cystic Fibrosis Patient.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Article
- Relationship of quantitative structure and pharmacokinetics in fluoroquinolone antibacterials.World journal of gastroenterology · 2007Article
- In vitro activities of 11 fluoroquinolones against 816 non-typhoidal strains of Salmonella enterica isolated from Finnish patients with special reference to reduced ciprofloxacin susceptibility.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinafloxacin (CI-960) is a potent broad-spectrum, fluoroquinolone antibiotic that has been studied for parenteral and oral administration in patients with serious infections. The objectives of these studies were to examine the pharmacokinetics and safety of clinafloxacin following administration of single and twice-daily intravenous (i.v.) and oral doses to volunteers. Plasma and urine samples were assayed by validated liquid chromatographic methods, and pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined by noncompartmental methods. Safety was evaluated by clinical observation and laboratory tests. Absorption was rapid after oral administration, with maximum concentrations in plasma (C(max)) generally occurring within 2 h. Concentrations in plasma declined biexponentially, with an average terminal half-life of 4 to 6 h after single doses and 5 to 7 h after multiple doses. Increases in C(max) and area under the concentration-time curves (AUC) were generally proportional to the dose. The volume of distribution was much greater than total body water. Approximately 40 to 75% of the clinafloxacin doses were excreted unchanged into urine. Absolute bioavailability of orally administered clinafloxacin was approximately 90% and did not change with increasing dose. Therefore, switching patients from i.v. to oral dosing should achieve similar concentrations in plasma. The tolerability of clinafloxacin was acceptable. No serious adverse events occurred. C(max) values and minimum plasma clinafloxacin concentrations during multiple dosing exceeded MICs for a wide range of organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.