Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11502515›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Continuous versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin in severe Staphylococcal infections: prospective multicenter randomized study.

M Wysocki, F Delatour, F Faurisson, A Rauss, Y Pean, B Misset, F Thomas, J F Timsit, T Similowski, H Mentec and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 380 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Development of a model to predict vancomycin serum concentration during continuous infusion of vancomycin in critically ill pediatric patients.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024
    Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

M WysockiMedico-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France. marc.wysocki@imm.fr
F Delatour
F Faurisson
A Rauss
Y Pean
B Misset
F Thomas
J F Timsit
T Similowski
H Mentec
L Mier
D Dreyfuss
Hôpital Louis-Mourier · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy · FRHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRHôpital des Diaconesses · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FRInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FRIntensive Care Foundation · AUSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A continuous infusion of vancomycin (CIV) may provide an alternative mode of infusion in severe hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant staphylococcal (MRS) infections. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study was designed to compare CIV (targeted plateau drug serum concentrations of 20 to 25 mg/liter) and intermittent infusions of vancomycin (IIV; targeted trough drug serum concentrations of 10 to 15 mg/liter) in 119 critically ill patients with MRS infections (bacteremic infections, 35%; pneumonia, 45%). Microbiological and clinical outcomes, safety, pharmacokinetics, ease of treatment adjustment, and cost were compared. Microbiological and clinical outcomes and safety were similar. CIV patients reached the targeted concentrations faster (36 +/- 31 versus 51 +/- 39 h, P = 0.029) and fewer samples were required for treatment monitoring than with IIV patients (7.7 +/- 2.2 versus 11.8 +/- 3.9 per treatment, P < 0.0001). The variability between patients in both the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(24h)) and the daily dose given over 10 days of treatment was lower with CIV than with IIV (variances, 14,621 versus 53,975 mg(2)/liter(2)/h(2) [P = 0.026] and 414 versus 818 g(2) [P = 0.057], respectively). The 10-day treatment cost per patient was $454 +/- 137 in the IIV group and was 23% lower in the CIV group ($321 +/- 81: P < 0.0001). In summary, for comparable efficacy and tolerance, CIV may be a cost-effective alternative to IIV.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID11502515
PMCPMC90678
OpenAlexW2104779095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.