ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001
In vitro and in vivo activities of syn2836, syn2869, syn2903, and syn2921: new series of triazole antifungal agents.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in vitro and in vivo activities of four azole compounds belonging to a new series of 2(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-(4-substituted piperazin-1-yl)-1-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) butanol antifungal agents is described. The compounds were selected from a library of azole compounds synthesized by our group. The in vitro activities of Syn2869, Syn2836, Syn2903, and Syn2921 against a panel of over 240 recently collected clinical isolates of yeast and molds were determined, and the results were compared with those obtained with fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC), and amphotericin B (AMB). The MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC(90)s) for the four test compounds for strains of Candida spp. ranged from <0.048 to 0.78 microg/ml. All compounds were also active against FLC-resistant Candida albicans and other Candida sp. strains. Moreover, MIC(90)s for strains of Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus spp., Trichophyton spp., and Microsporum spp. were also low and ranged from <0.048 to 0.39 microg/ml. The test compounds produced a fungistatic pattern during the time-kill kinetic studies. In vivo studies indicated that all four test compounds have good efficacies against C. albicans in a murine systemic infection model and significantly improved the survival rates of the infected mice. The results for Syn2903 were similar to those for FLC, while the other compounds were slightly less effective but had ranges of activities similar to the range of activity of ITC. The compounds were also evaluated against an Aspergillus fumigatus systemic infection. Syn2903 was also superior to ITC, whereas the efficacy data for the other compounds were similar to those for ITC. It was concluded from the data generated for this new series of azole compounds in the studies described above that further pharmacokinetic and toxicologic evaluations are warranted prior to selection of a candidate compound for preclinical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.