Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11501583›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2001

Loss of chromosomal integrity in human mammary epithelial cells subsequent to escape from senescence.

T D Tlsty, S R Romanov, B K Kozakiewicz, C R Holst, L M Haupt, Y G Crawford, New Collective Author

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Seed in soil, with an epigenetic view.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Epithelial progenitors in the normal human mammary gland.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2005
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Epigenetic changes accompanying human mammary epithelial cell immortalization.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2001
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T D TlstyDepartment of Pathology, University of California at San Francisco, 94143-0506, USA. ttlsty@itsa.icsf.edu
S R Romanov
B K Kozakiewicz
C R Holst
L M Haupt
Y G Crawford
New Collective Author
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic changes that foster cancer can be either genetic or epigenetic in nature. Early studies focused on genetic changes and how mutational events contribute to changes in gene expression. These point mutations, deletions and amplifications are known to activate oncogenes and inactivate tumor suppressor genes. More recently, multiple epigenetic changes that can have a profound effect on carcinogenesis have been identified. These epigenetic events, such as the methylation of promoter sequences in genes, are under active investigation. In this review we will describe a methylation event that occurs during the propagation of human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) in culture and detail the accompanying genetic alterations that have been observed.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsBreastCell DivisionCell LineCells, CulturedCell Transformation, NeoplasticCellular SenescenceDNA MethylationEpithelial CellsFemaleFibroblastsHumansOncogene Proteins, ViralPromoter Regions, GeneticOncogene Proteins, ViralNASA Discipline Radiation HealthNon-NASA Center

Identifiers

PMID11501583
OpenAlexW1520005416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.