Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11501487›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2001

Molecular monitoring of ruminal prevotellas.

K Tepsic, G Avgustin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K TepsicZootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia.
G Avgustin
University of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and preliminary use of two different molecular approaches for rapid enumeration and monitoring of ruminal prevotellas are described. Several oligonucleotide DNA probes, specific for the genus Prevotella and the species P. ruminicola and P. bryantii were labeled with various fluorochromes and used in in situ hybridization experiments. Epifluorescent microscopy was successfully used for the detection of fluorescent signal emitted by the probes in pure and mixed culture samples. The enumeration of the target cells and the analysis of the crude rumen fluid proved to be difficult, however, mainly due to the autofluorescent background and nonhomogeneous distribution of the cells on the microscope slide. The development of a competitive PCR system for ruminal prevotellas is described and the preliminary results of the rumen fluid analysis from a black-and-white Holstein cow are given.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFluorescent DyesIn Situ HybridizationMicroscopy, FluorescenceOligonucleotide ProbesPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevotellaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenFluorescent DyesOligonucleotide ProbesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID11501487
OpenAlexW2083690563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.