Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11501474›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2001

Systematics and evolution of ruminal species of the genus Prevotella.

G Avgustin, A Ramsak, M Peterka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring the Effect of GastrointestinalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The bacteriophages of ruminal prevotellas.Folia microbiologica · 2001
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G AvgustinZootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia.
A Ramsak
M Peterka
University of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial species of the genus Prevotella represent a numerically dominant microbial population in the rumen of cattle. They belong to the phylogenetic division Cytophaga-Flexibacter-Bacteroides (CFB) which is a large group of ecologically diverse bacteria with only a few shared traits. The phylogenetic descent from a common ancestor seems to be unquestionable, however, as judged from the small subunit ribosomal RNA analysis. Only 4 ruminal Prevotella species have been described to date, even though the sequence analysis of directly retrieved 16S rRNA genes indicates a large genetic diversity within this group of rumen bacteria. The closest relatives of ruminal Prevotella spp. are not surprisingly other species of the genus Prevotella, typically inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract, oral cavity and genital areas of other animals and man. The previous phylogenetic analysis showed that species of the genus Prevotella can be split into two groups or superclusters, the "ruminal" and the "non-ruminal prevotellas". One of 4 currently described ruminal Prevotella spp., i.e. P. albensis, has been placed outside the supercluster containing ruminal Prevotella spp. and within the supercluster containing the non-ruminal Prevotella spp. However, the number of available small subunit rRNA sequences from this species represents only a fraction of all known ruminal Prevotella sequences.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansPrevotellaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRumenDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID11501474
OpenAlexW2019738286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.