Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11500410›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2001

Protective efficacy of a DNA vaccine encoding antigen 85A from Mycobacterium bovis BCG against Buruli ulcer.

A Tanghe, J Content, J P Van Vooren, F Portaels, K Huygen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unlocking Opportunities forACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Current genomics · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vaccine strategies against cystic fibrosis pathogens.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A TangheMycobacterial Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
J Content
J P Van Vooren
F Portaels
K Huygen
Erasmus Hospital · BEInstitut Pasteur · FRInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS RESEARCH MATERIALS AND VACINE TESTINGN01AI075320 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · 1997 to 2004
$980k
NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-75320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buruli ulcer, caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, is characterized by deep and necrotizing skin lesions, mostly on the arms and legs. Together with tuberculosis and leprosy, this mycobacterial disease has become a major health problem in tropical and subtropical regions, particularly in central and western Africa. No specific vaccine is available for Buruli ulcer. There is, however, evidence in the literature that suggests a cross-reactive protective role of the tuberculosis vaccine M. bovis BCG. To identify potential mechanisms for this cross-protection, we identified and characterized the M. ulcerans homologue of the important protective mycobacterial antigen 85 (Ag85A) from BCG. The homologue is well conserved in M. ulcerans, showing 84.1% amino acid sequence identity and 91% conserved residues compared to the sequence from BCG. This antigen was sufficiently conserved to allow cross-reactive protection, as demonstrated by the ability of M. ulcerans- infected mice to exhibit strong cellular immune responses to both BCG and its purified Ag85 complex. To further address the mechanism of cross-reactive protection, we demonstrate here that prior vaccination with either BCG or plasmid DNA encoding BCG Ag85A is capable of significantly reducing the bacterial load in the footpads of M. ulcerans- infected mice, as determined by Ziehl-Neelsen staining and by actual counting of CFU on 7H11 Middlebrook agar. Together, the results reported here support the potential of a cross-protective Ag85-based future vaccine against tuberculosis, Buruli ulcer, and leprosy.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesBase SequenceCross ReactionsFootMiceMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium ulceransSequence Analysis, DNASkin UlcerVaccinationVaccines, DNAantigen 85A, Mycobacterium ulceransantigen 85, Mycobacterium bovisAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID11500410
PMCPMC98650
OpenAlexW2168649602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.