ReviewHeart failure reviews2000
Mechanisms and efficacy of LV pre-excitation for patients with heart failure and supra-normal systolic function.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular hypertrophy due to genetic mutations of sarcomeric proteins or that associated with long-standing hypertension typically yields a cavity with hyperdynamic ejection, elevated diastolic pressures, and limited filling volumes. The net result is reduced reserve capacity, dyspnea with exertional intolerance, and chest discomfort despite normal appearing coronary vessels. In addition to pharmacologic therapy by agents having negative inotropic effects, recent studies have examined the potential of ventricular pacing using right apical pre-excitation as a treatment for these disorders. This form of pacing can increase end-systolic volume and reduce cavity obliteration in both forms of the disease, yet has no demonstrable acute benefit on diastolic function. Chronic therapy trials have yielded mixed results, with more favorable responses observed in older patients particularly those with hypertensive hypertrophic disease. These data have also highlighted the importance of enhancing systolic reserve rather than diastolic function as a key therapeutic effect from pacing therapy. This review discusses the mechanisms by which pacing with ventricular pre-excitation acutely influences ventricular function, and summarizes results of recent clinical trials, putting the data into perspective regarding the relative role of systolic versus diastolic effects in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.