ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Effects of the novel selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, SB 234551, on the cardiovascular responses to endotoxaemia in conscious rats.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interception of the endotoxin-induced arterial hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors.Vascular pharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. In conscious, freely moving, male, Long Evans rats, regional haemodynamic responses to exogenous endothelin-1 (ET-1; 25, 50 and 250 pmol kg(-1) i.v.) were assessed in the presence of vehicle, or the selective ET(A)-receptor antagonist, SB 234551. On the following day, the effects of SB 234551 on the haemodynamic responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion (150 microg kg(-1) h(-1), i.v.) were determined. 2. When SB 234551 was given i.v. by primed infusion at a dose of 0.3 mg kg(-1) bolus, 0.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1) infusion, it caused selective inhibition of the vasoconstrictor effects of exogenous endothelin-1, whereas at a dose of 1 mg kg(-1), 1 mg kg(-1) h(-1), SB 234551 also inhibited some of the vasodilator effects of endothelin-1. 3. Infusion of LPS, in the presence of vehicle, caused a short-lived (1 - 2 h) hypotension, tachycardia, and vasodilatation in renal, superior mesenteric and hindquarters vascular beds. Thereafter, blood pressure, heart rate and mesenteric vascular conductance returned to baseline values, but renal vasodilatation persisted, and there was vasoconstriction in the hindquarters. 4. In the presence of SB 234551 (0.3 mg kg(-1), 0.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1)), the early (1 - 2 h) cardiovascular responses to LPS infusion were unaffected, but the subsequent recovery of mean arterial blood pressure was impaired, due to developing vasodilatation in the mesenteric and, to a lesser extent, hindquarters, vascular beds. SB 234551 had no effect on the renal haemodynamic responses to LPS infusion. 5. The results confirm an important, regionally-selective, vasoconstrictor role for endogenous endothelin in this model of endotoxaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.