Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11493324›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2001

Eliciting patients' values by use of 'willingness to pay': letting the theory drive the method.

C Donaldson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07723885 (Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low-cost Menstrual Health and Hygiene), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07723885 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low-cost Menstrual Health and Hygiene (MHH) Intervention in the Health Systems in Bangladesh

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshRan2025 to 2026Enrolled700ConditionsMenstrual Health Intervention, Product Use Issue, Hygiene Practices and Knowledge, Menstrual Hygiene ManagementArmsMenstrual health and hygiene intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Perspectives toward oral mucositis prevention from parents and health care professionals in pediatric cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  12. Psychometric properties of the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire for child self-report and importance of mucositis in children treated with chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The use of willingness to pay to assess public preferences towards the fortification of foodstuffs with folic acid.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C DonaldsonDepartment of Economics, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada. cdonalds@ucalgary.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the three different ways in which 'willingness to pay' (WTP) has been used to elicit patients' values of alternative interventions.

designFor each of the three approaches a survey of patients or the public was undertaken. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND

interventionsstudied For two surveys, the setting was Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, where pregnant women were asked about their WTP for different methods of prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. In the third survey, parents of primary and secondary schoolchildren were asked about their WTP for different ways of providing child health services.

main outcome measuresAbility of WTP to discriminate between options (i.e. to say whether one option is 'better' than another) and the consistency of WTP with stated preferences.

resultsExperience with some methods shows that, despite the apparent logic of the technique, it is difficult to elicit consistent responses whereby WTP values derived match the rankings of interventions compared. The most promising technique, the 'marginal approach', happens to conform more with economic theory than other approaches. Potential limitations of WTP, such as its association with ability to pay, are discussed, as are approaches to dealing with such problems. Finally, if patients prefer an intervention that is more costly than the status quo, logic dictates that those extra resources will have to be obtained from another health-care programme. In such contexts, to aid decision-making, values derived from members of the community for different programmes may be more relevant than values derived from patients. Initial studies in the use of WTP in this broader context of eliciting community values are also outlined.

conclusionsWTP has potential, but its application, and interpretation, are not straightforward. More testing of the 'marginal approach' is required and greater use of qualitative research, to assess the validity of the approach, should be made in this area.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Care CostsAdultChoice BehaviorCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingFees, MedicalFemaleFinancing, PersonalGenetic CounselingHumansMalePregnancyState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID11493324
PMCPMC5060062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.