Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11487520›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001

A comparison of effects measured with isotonic and isometric recording: II. Concentration-effect curves for physiological antagonists.

R B Barlow, S M Bond, C Grant, D S McQueen, Z Yaqoob

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R B BarlowDepartment of Neuroscience, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, UK.
S M Bond
C Grant
D S McQueen
Z Yaqoob
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If one drug, B, antagonizes another, A, by producing the opposite physiological effect, the antagonist concentration-effect curves should be affected by the recording system, which limits the range of agonist responses. With pieces of isolated guinea-pig ileum taken from adjacent parts of the same animal, one recorded isotonically, the other isometrically with the same load, the isotonic IC(50) values for (-)isoprenaline opposing carbachol or histamine were lower than the isometric values (P<0.01) but there was a significant correlation between them (P<0.01): the isotonic curves were steeper (P<0.01) and there were wider shifts in IC(50) before increasing the agonist reduced the maximum relaxation. In similar experiments with pieces of rat uterus in oestrus from the same animal, the concentration-effect curves for carbachol opposed by increasing concentrations of (-)isoprenaline or (-)adrenaline had slightly lower EC(50) values with isometric recording but there was a significant correlation (P<0.01) with isotonic values. The antagonist effect (ratio of the EC(50) relative to that for the control) was higher with isotonic recording (P<0.01 for (-)isoprenaline, P<0.025 for (-)adrenaline) and all (27) curves were steeper than the corresponding isometric curve (P<0.001). The influence of the method of recording on the results is expected from the narrower operational window and smaller upper limit to relaxation with isotonic recording. A way of obtaining measurements of IC(50) against a standard agonist effect is suggested in an Appendix.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbacholDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleGuinea PigsHistamineIleumIn Vitro TechniquesIsometric ContractionIsoproterenolIsotonic ContractionRatsRats, WistarUterusCarbacholHistamineIsoproterenol

Identifiers

PMID11487520
PMCPMC1572875
OpenAlexW2005598450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.