ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
A comparison of effects measured with isotonic and isometric recording: II. Concentration-effect curves for physiological antagonists.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological characterization of cannabinoid receptor activity in the rat-isolated ileum myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation.British journal of pharmacology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
If one drug, B, antagonizes another, A, by producing the opposite physiological effect, the antagonist concentration-effect curves should be affected by the recording system, which limits the range of agonist responses. With pieces of isolated guinea-pig ileum taken from adjacent parts of the same animal, one recorded isotonically, the other isometrically with the same load, the isotonic IC(50) values for (-)isoprenaline opposing carbachol or histamine were lower than the isometric values (P<0.01) but there was a significant correlation between them (P<0.01): the isotonic curves were steeper (P<0.01) and there were wider shifts in IC(50) before increasing the agonist reduced the maximum relaxation. In similar experiments with pieces of rat uterus in oestrus from the same animal, the concentration-effect curves for carbachol opposed by increasing concentrations of (-)isoprenaline or (-)adrenaline had slightly lower EC(50) values with isometric recording but there was a significant correlation (P<0.01) with isotonic values. The antagonist effect (ratio of the EC(50) relative to that for the control) was higher with isotonic recording (P<0.01 for (-)isoprenaline, P<0.025 for (-)adrenaline) and all (27) curves were steeper than the corresponding isometric curve (P<0.001). The influence of the method of recording on the results is expected from the narrower operational window and smaller upper limit to relaxation with isotonic recording. A way of obtaining measurements of IC(50) against a standard agonist effect is suggested in an Appendix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.