Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11487513›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001

Pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptors in mouse isolated urinary bladder smooth muscle.

A Choppin, R M Eglen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional significance of muscarinic receptor expression within the proximal and distal rat vagina.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2009
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interactions between drugs and occupied receptors.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2007
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The M2 muscarinic receptor mediates in vitro bladder contractions from patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2004
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A ChoppinGenitourinary-Pharmacology, Neurobiology Unit, Roche Bioscience, Palo Alto, California, CA 94304, U.S.A. Achoppin@Deltagen.com
R M Eglen
Bioscience Research · USDiscoveRx (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacological characteristics of muscarinic receptors in the male mice urinary bladder smooth muscle were studied. (+)-Cis-dioxolane, oxotremorine-M, acetylcholine, carbachol and pilocarpine induced concentration-dependent contractions of the urinary bladder smooth muscle (pEC(50)=6.6+/-0.1, 6.9+/-0.1, 6.7+/-0.1, 5.8+/-0.1 and 5.8+/-0.1, E(Max)=3.2+/-0.8 g, 2.7+/-0.4 g, 1.0+/-0.1 g, 2.7+/-0.3 and 0.9+/-0.2 g, respectively, n=4). These contractions were competitively antagonized by a range of muscarinic receptor antagonists (pK(B) values): atropine (9.22+/-0.09), pirenzepine (6.85+/-0.08), 4-DAMP (8.42+/-0.14), methoctramine (5.96+/-0.05), p-F-HHSiD (7.48+/-0.09), tolterodine (8.89+/-0.13), AQ-RA 741 (7.04+/-0.12), s-secoverine (8.21+/-0.09), zamifenacin (8.30+/-0.17) and darifenacin (8.70+/-0.09). In this tissue, the pK(B) values correlated most favourably with pK(i) values for these compounds at human recombinant muscarinic M(3) receptors. A significant correlation was also noted at human recombinant muscarinic m5 receptors given the poor discriminative ability of ligands between M(3) and m5 receptors. In recontraction studies, in which the muscarinic M(3) receptor population was decreased, and conditions optimized to study M(2) receptor activation, methoctramine exhibited an affinity estimate consistent with muscarinic M(3) receptors (pK(B)=6.23+/-0.14; pA(2)=6.16+/-0.03). Overall, these data study suggest that muscarinic M(3) receptors are the predominant, if not the exclusive, subtype mediating contractile responses to muscarinic agonists in male mouse urinary bladder smooth muscle.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsCarbacholDiaminesDioxolanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SmoothOxotremorinePilocarpine4-diphenylacetoxy-1,1-dimethylpiperidiniumAcetylcholineCarbacholDiaminesDioxolanesformal glycolmethoctramineMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsOxotremorineoxotremorine MPilocarpinePiperidinesReceptors, Muscarinic

Identifiers

PMID11487513
PMCPMC1572871
OpenAlexW1988216302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.