Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11487450›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2001

Did the antioxidant trials fail to validate the oxidation hypothesis?

S Parthasarathy, N Khan-Merchant, M Penumetcha, B V Khan, N Santanam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Targeting vascular (endothelial) dysfunction.British journal of pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. AGE restriction in diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2011
    Review
  7. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antioxidants and cardiovascular disease: Still a topic of interest.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2004
    Article
  11. The Jeremiah Metzger Lecture. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: redox as a unifying mechanism.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S ParthasarathyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, 1639 Pierce Drive, #4300 WMB, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. spartha@emory.edu
N Khan-Merchant
M Penumetcha
B V Khan
N Santanam

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most clinical trials on antioxidants using vitamin E or beta-carotene have failed to note any significant change in cardiovascular endpoints. The results of these studies have been interpreted as a setback for the oxidation hypothesis. An analysis of the hypothesis and the trials, however, points out major misconceptions about the hypothesis and unjustified outcome expectations. Wrong selection of patient population, endpoints that are incompatible with the hypothesis, poor choice of antioxidants, and lack of inclusion of biochemical markers of oxidative stress and markers of vascular response are some of the contributors to the "failure" of these trials.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsArteriosclerosisBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHumansOxidative StressPatient SelectionReproducibility of ResultsAntioxidantsBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.