Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11485955›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Declaring financial competing interests: survey of five general medical journals.

A Hussain, R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Financial and non-financial conflicts of interests in psychiatry.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2010
    Review
  6. Re-envisioning our approach to research in academia.Clinical and translational science · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2006
    Review
  10. Managing conflict of interest: sense and sensibility.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2005
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Making progress with competing interests.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A HussainBMJ, London WC1H 9JR. hussainamina@hotmail.com
R Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchConflict of InterestDisclosureDrug IndustryEditorial PoliciesPublishingResearch Support as TopicBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical Approach

Identifiers

PMID11485955
PMCPMC35347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.