Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11485680›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2001

A one-year study of foodborne illnesses in the municipality of Uppsala, Sweden.

R Lindqvist, Y Andersson, J Lindbäck, M Wegscheider, Y Eriksson, L Tideström, A Lagerqvist-Widh, K O Hedlund, S Löfdahl, L Svensson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial drug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy products.Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R LindqvistNational Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden. roli@slv.se
Y Andersson
J Lindbäck
M Wegscheider
Y Eriksson
L Tideström
A Lagerqvist-Widh
K O Hedlund
S Löfdahl
L Svensson
A Norinder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance was enhanced and a retrospective interview study performed in 1998-99 to determine incidence, causes, and costs of foodborne illnesses in Uppsala, Sweden. Sixty-eight percent of the detected foodborne illness incidents were single cases, and 32% were outbreaks. Most (85%) of the incidents came to the attention of the municipal authorities through telephone calls from affected persons. Calicivirus, Campylobacter spp., and Staphyloccocus aureus were the most common etiological agents; meat, meat products, and mixed dishes were the most implicated food categories. The incidence of foodborne illness was estimated to be 38 cases per 1,000 inhabitants per year. The estimated average costs per illness were 2,164 Swedish Krona (SEK) ($246) to society and 500 SEK ($57) to the patient. The annual cost of foodborne illnesses in Sweden was estimated to be 1,082 million SEK ($123 million).

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAdolescentBacterial InfectionsFoodborne DiseasesHumansIncidenceMeatMeat ProductsPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesSwedenUrban PopulationVirus Diseases

Identifiers

PMID11485680
PMCPMC2631855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.