Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11483640›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2001

Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact.

S Michie, M Bobrow, T M Marteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.The New England journal of medicine · 2009
    Trial
  8. Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2008
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for a Child's Autism on Parental Perceptions.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.Journal of community genetics · 2021
    Article
  13. A framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling.Journal of community genetics · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S MichiePsychology and Genetics Research Group, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's Medical School, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London SE1 9RT, UK. susan.michie@kcl.ac.uk
M Bobrow
T M Marteau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine whether, following predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), children or adults receiving positive results experience clinically significant levels of anxiety or depression, and whether children receiving positive results experience higher levels of anxiety or depression than adults receiving positive results.

designTwo studies, one cross sectional and one prospective. SAMPLE: 208 unaffected subjects (148 adults and 60 children) at risk for FAP who have undergone genetic testing since 1990. MAIN MEASURES: DEPENDENT VARIABLES: anxiety, depression; independent variables: test results, demographic measures, psychological resources (optimism, self-esteem).

resultsStudy 1. In children receiving positive results, mean scores for anxiety and depression were within the normal range. There was a trend for children receiving positive results to be more anxious and depressed than those receiving negative results. In adults, mean scores for anxiety were within the normal range for those receiving negative results, but were in the clinical range for those receiving positive results, with 43% (95% CI 23-65) of the latter having scores in this range. Regardless of test result, adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they were low in optimism or self-esteem. Children receiving positive or negative results did not experience greater anxiety or depression than adults. Study 2. For children receiving a positive test result, mean scores for anxiety, depression, and self-esteem were unchanged over the year following the result, while mean anxiety scores decreased and self-esteem increased after receipt of a negative test result over the same period of time.

conclusionChildren, as a group, did not show clinically significant distress over the first year following predictive genetic testing. Adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they received a positive result or were low in optimism or self-esteem, with interacting effects. The association between anxiety, self-esteem, and optimism suggests that counselling should be targeted, not only at those with positive test results, but also at those low in psychological resources.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiAdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEmotionsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID11483640
PMCPMC1734924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.