Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11483587›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Virtual genome scan: a tool for restriction landmark-based scanning of the human genome.

J M Rouillard, A E Erson, R Kuick, J Asakawa, K Wimmer, M Muleris, E M Petty, S Hanash

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in mammary development and tumorigenesis.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2004
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

J M RouillardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
A E Erson
R Kuick
J Asakawa
K Wimmer
M Muleris
E M Petty
S Hanash
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

PROGRAM PROJECT: THE STUDY OF HUMAN MUTATIONP01CA026803 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HANASH, SAMIR M · 1985 to 2001
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA26803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial interest in implementing technologies that allow comparisons of whole genomes of individuals and of tissues and cell populations. Restriction landmark genome scanning (RLGS) is a highly resolving gel-based technique in which several thousand fragments in genomic digests are visualized simultaneously and quantitatively analyzed. The widespread use of RLGS has been hampered by difficulty in deriving sequence information for displayed fragments and a lack of whole-genome sequence-based framework for interpreting RLGS patterns. We have developed informatics tools for comparisons of sample derived RLGS patterns with patterns predicted from the human genome sequence and displayed as Virtual Genome Scans (VGS). The tools developed allow sequence prediction of fragments in RLGS patterns obtained with different restriction enzyme combinations. The utility of VGS is demonstrated by the identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms, and of amplifications, deletions, and methylation changes in tumor-derived CpG islands and the characterization of an amplified region in a breast tumor that spanned <230 kb on 17q23.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TransformedChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Computational BiologyDatabases, FactualGene AmplificationHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRestriction MappingTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID11483587
PMCPMC311067
OpenAlexW2167750884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.