ArticleInternational journal of cardiac imaging2000
3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients.
Article in International journal of cardiac imaging, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale Coronary Arterial Network Generation and Hemodynamics Using Patient-Specific Fractional Myocardial Blood Volume.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D localization from 2D X-ray projection.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2019Article
- In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
- Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Article
- Impact of the bifurcation angle on major cardiac events after cross-over single stent strategy in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2014Article
- Rui Liao's work on patient-specific 3-D model guidance for interventional and hybrid-operating-room applications.World journal of radiology · 2011Article
- 3-D reconstruction of the coronary artery tree from multiple views of a rotational X-ray angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010Article
- Optimization of acquisition trajectories for 3D rotational coronary venography.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2010Review
- Determination of optimal viewing regions for X-ray coronary angiography based on a quantitative analysis of 3D reconstructed models.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2009Article
- Rotational angiography (RA) and three-dimensional imaging (3-DRA): an available clinical tool.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2007Article
- Three-dimensional analysis of in vivo coronary stent--coronary artery interactions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2004Article
- Changes in the way diagnostic coronary arteriography is performed due to the interventional prospect: the clinical impact.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent coronary angiographic techniques display complex three-dimensional (3D) coronary structures in two dimensions (2D). We have developed a 3D reconstruction (3DR) algorithm using standard single-plane angiographic images that allows for 3D display of coronary structures. The purpose of this study was to validate our 3DR algorithm and quantify anatomic characteristics of the right coronary artery (RCA) in vivo.
methodsAccuracy and reproducibility studies were performed using 3DRs of a coronary phantom and in vivo following 3DRs in 40 patients. The anatomic features of the RCA were then quantified in 100 patients.
resultsComparison of length and bifurcation angles (BA) from the phantom to the 3DRs revealed good accuracy and correlation for both (r = 0.95 and 0.93 respectively), with diameter error of < 7%. In vivo, the average root mean square (RMS) error in the spatial coordinates of the vessel centerlines was 3.12 +/- 0.77 and 3.16 +/- 0.75 mm in 20 left coronary arteries (LCA) and 20 RCAs respectively. Interobserver average RMS error was 3.47 +/- 1.96 mm and intraobserver average RMS error was 3.02 +/- 1.07 and 3.44 +/- 1.57 mm for two different operators (p = NS). The average RCA length was 10.2 +/- 1.7 cm, average radius of curvature (ROC) was 52 +/- 9 degrees, and the average 3D bifurcation angle of the posterior descending artery (PDA) from the RCA was 55 +/- 22 degrees. Foreshortening (FS) of the segments of the RCA in three 'standard' projections ranged from 0-60, 0-75, and 0-82% respectively.
conclusionsUsing our 3DR algorithm patient-specific anatomic characteristics can be accurately displayed and quantified, expanding the information that can be derived from routine coronary angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11482706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.