Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11481587›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2001

The significance of not finding a gene.

M A Province

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pleiotropic genes for metabolic syndrome and inflammation.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Meta-analyses of genome-wide linkage scans of anxiety-related phenotypes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Meta-analysis in psychiatric genetics.Current psychiatry reports · 2005
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Article
  16. A correlated meta-analysis strategy for data mining "OMIC" scans.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M A ProvinceDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. mike@wubios.wustl.edu

Funding

The Family Blood Pressure Program (Program Data Center)U01HL054473 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 2000 to 2008
$5.8M
RESEARCH PROJECT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGYR01GM028719 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 1985 to 2008
$2.0M
HYPERGEN- DATA COORDINATING CENTERU10HL054473 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, DABEERU C · 1995 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL54473NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL054473NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL054473NIGMS NIH HHS GM28719NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more investigators conduct extensive whole-genome linkage scans for complex traits, interest is growing in meta-analysis as a way of integrating the weak or conflicting evidence from multiple studies. However, there is a bias in the most commonly used meta-analysis linkage technique (i.e., Fisher's [1925] method of combining of P values) when it is applied to many nonparametric (i.e., model free) linkage results. The bias arises in those methods (e.g., variance components, affected sib pair, extremely discordant sib pairs, etc.) that truncate all "negative evidence against linkage" into the single value of LOD = 0. If incorrectly handled, this bias can artificially inflate or deflate the combined meta-analysis linkage results for any given locus. This is an especially troublesome problem in the context of a genome scan, since LOD = 0 is expected to occur over half the unlinked genome. The bias can be overcome (nearly) completely by simply interpreting LOD = 0 as a P value of 1divided by 2ln(2) is approximately equal to .72 in Fisher's formula.

Indexed as

BiasData Interpretation, StatisticalGenome, HumanHumansMeta-Analysis as Topic

Identifiers

PMID11481587
PMCPMC1235495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.