Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11479124›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2001

Random-peptide libraries and antigen-fragment libraries for epitope mapping and the development of vaccines and diagnostics.

M B Irving, O Pan, J K Scott

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M B IrvingDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, BC V5A 1S6, Burnaby, Canada.
O Pan
J K Scott
Simon Fraser University · CA

Funding

FAB LIBRARIES TO DISCOVER VACCINE LEADS AGAINST HIV-1R21AI046303 · NIAID · SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT, JAMIE K · 1999 to 2000
$158k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI046303-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random peptide libraries and antigen-fragment libraries (also known as gene-fragment libraries) have been used to identify epitopes on protein antigens. These technologies promise to make significant contributions to diagnostic and vaccine development. Researchers in a number of labs have shown that phage selected from libraries with protective antibodies, raised against whole antigen, can be used as immunogens to stimulate antibody responses that bind native antigen and provide protection in vivo. Others have used the sera of patients with idiopathic diseases to screen libraries, and by this approach have identified candidate antigens involved in immune disease. These may prove useful for diagnosis and, possibly, in determining disease etiology.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ReactionsPeptide LibraryReagent Kits, DiagnosticVaccinesAntibodiesAntigensBacteriophagesDrug CarriersEpitope MappingLigandsAntibodiesAntigensDrug CarriersLigandsPeptide LibraryReagent Kits, DiagnosticVaccines

Identifiers

PMID11479124
PMCPMC7129944
OpenAlexW2004490529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.