Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11477025›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2001

Physical activity in Dublin children aged 7-9 years.

J Hussey, J Gormley, C Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exercise portrayal in children's television programs: analysis of the UK and Irish programming.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Obesity in Irish youth: epidemiology and implications.Irish journal of medical science · 2009
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Exercise testing in children with cystic fibrosis.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J HusseyTrinity College School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland. jmhussey@tcd.ie
J Gormley
C Bell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the amount of regular activity and time spent in sedentary occupations in children aged 7--9 years. Sex differences in levels of activity and time and facilities for physical education at school were also examined.

methodsA 10% sample of Dublin National Schools were selected. Parents of children in second class were surveyed. The questionnaire used was a modification of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents. Teachers of second class were questioned about the time and facilities for physical education in schools.

resultsSome 39% of children were participating in hard exercise for at least 20 minutes three or more times a week, with fewer girls (28%) than boys (53%) contributing to this result. A further 57% of children were engaging in at least 20 minutes of light exercise three or more times a week, with no sex differences. Estimated energy expenditure in regular activity was higher in boys than girls. Most (78%) of the children were spending one to three hours a day sedentary in front of a screen.

conclusionsThis study provides comprehensive data on physical activity levels in Dublin schoolchildren aged 7--9 years. The amount of inactivity is of concern. Even at this young age, boys are reported to participate in more physical activity than girls.

Indexed as

ExerciseChildEnergy MetabolismFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIrelandLeisure ActivitiesMaleParentsPhysical Education and TrainingPopulation SurveillanceSchoolsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsStudents

Identifiers

PMID11477025
PMCPMC1724360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.