Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11477013›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of sports medicine2001

Sepsis and mechanisms of inflammatory response: is exercise a good model?

R J Shephard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of sports medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acute phase reactions inThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J ShephardFaculty of Physical Education and Health and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto and Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. royjshep@mountain-inter.net
Defence Research and Development Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe immune changes induced by a bout of prolonged and vigorous exercise have been suggested to be a useful experimental model of sepsis and the inflammatory response. Available literature was reviewed to evaluate this hypothesis.

methodsLiterature describing the immune response to various patterns of exercise was compared with data on the immune changes observed during sepsis and inflammation.

resultsAlthough there are qualitative similarities between the immune responses to exercise and sepsis, the magnitude of the changes induced by most forms of exercise remains much smaller than in a typical inflammatory response. Indeed, the exercise induced changes in some key elements such as plasma cytokine concentrations are too small to be detected reliably by current technology.

conclusionsIf exercise is to provide a valid model of sepsis and the inflammatory response, it will be necessary to focus on subjects who are willing to exercise extremely hard, to use the pattern of exercise that has the greatest effect on the immune system, and to combine this stimulus with other psychological, environmental, or nutritional stressors.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytokinesEndorphinsExerciseHumansInflammationKiller Cells, NaturalLeukocytesPhysiology, ComparativeProspective StudiesRNA, MessengerSepsisStress, PhysiologicalAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytokinesEndorphinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID11477013
PMCPMC1724364
OpenAlexW2155586185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.