Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11473916›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study.

A M Tod, C Read, A Lacey, J Abbott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Influences of socioeconomic deprivation on GPs' decisions to refer patients to cardiology: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Being healthy: a grounded theory study of help seeking behaviour among Chinese elders living in the UK.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M TodPublic Health, Rotherham Health Authority, Bevan House, Rotherham S60 3AQ. cm4at@sheffield.ac.uk
C Read
A Lacey
J Abbott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify factors within the South Yorkshire coalfields that influence use of health services by people with angina.

designQualitative study using semistructured individual and group interviews.

settingGeneral practice and community settings in Barnsley and Rotherham health authorities.

participants14 patients with stable angina and nine primary care staff had individual interviews plus five community groups and one group of general practitioners.

main outcome measuresBarriers to accessing health services.

resultsA complex web of factors was identified that prevented, delayed, or facilitated referral to secondary care. Delay, denial, and self management by patients meant that the full extent of symptoms often remained hidden from general practitioners, resulting in a delayed or missed referral. Barriers identified fell into six categories: structural, personal, social and cultural, past experience and expectations, diagnostic confusion, and knowledge and awareness.

conclusionsMany of the factors influencing referral operate before general practitioners become involved. Community development could be one way of tackling inequalities and promoting sustainable change. Structural changes are needed to improve access and increase the acceptability of general practice services. Primary care staff should be educated to detect underreporting of symptoms and promote appropriate referral.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationAgedAngina PectorisAnxietyEnglandFearFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychosocial DeprivationSelf CareSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID11473916
PMCPMC35276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.