Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11470815›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2001

Mitosis, microtubules, and the matrix.

J M Scholey, G C Rogers, D J Sharp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The molecular basis of anaphase A in animal cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Eg5 steps it up!Cell division · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J M ScholeySection of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. jmscholey@ucdavis.edu
G C Rogers
D J Sharp

Funding

Mitotic Motors in the Drosophila Embryo.R01GM055507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI SCHOLEY, JONATHAN M. · 1997 to 2013
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM55507NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical events of mitosis depend on the action of microtubules and mitotic motors, but whether these spindle components act alone or in concert with a spindle matrix is an important question.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsAnimalsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCytoskeletonDrosophilaKinetochoresMicrotubulesMitosisMolecular Motor ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSpindle ApparatusChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophila ProteinsMolecular Motor ProteinsNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsNuclear Proteinsskeletor protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID11470815
PMCPMC2150769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.