Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11470045›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2001

The antiphospholipid syndrome and infection.

G N Dalekos, K Zachou, C Liaskos

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infection-Triggered Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Critical Overview.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antiphospholipid syndrome infectious origin.Journal of clinical immunology · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G N DalekosLarisa Medical School, University of Thessaly, 22 Papakiriazi str., 412 22, Larisa, Greece. dalekos@ med.uth.gr
K Zachou
C Liaskos
University of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious agents have been implicated in the induction of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and the development of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This review focuses on the types of aPL antibodies detected in infections and addresses whether these antibodies are of clinical importance in patients with infections. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is given special attention because this virus has the propensity to induce various autoimmune phenomena. Several aspects are emphasized that should be considered carefully when interpreting results. Most of the published data agree that thrombophilia is not observed in patients with infections (including HCV) because aPL antibodies are mostly the natural or nonpathogenic type. Thus, we do not recommend routinely testing for HCV in patients with APS. However, not all infection-associated aPL antibodies are cofactor independent. For instance, infections are increasingly recognized as a major precipitating condition of the catastrophic variant of APS, perhaps via mechanisms of molecular mimicry. Therefore, it may be possible to prevent this devastating evolution if the infectious process is promptly recognized and exhaustively treated.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, AnticardiolipinAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeBacterial InfectionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansInfectionsLupus Coagulation InhibitorMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionAntibodies, AnticardiolipinAntibodies, AntiphospholipidLupus Coagulation Inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID11470045
OpenAlexW2050464063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.