Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11469983›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2001

Fecal Incontinence.

Ronald Fogel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald FogelDivision of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. rfogel1@HFHS.org
Henry Ford Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a socially devastating clinical condition. Initial symptomatic treatment includes exclusion of foods that precipitate the problem, increased use of fiber, and drug therapy with loperamide. Persistence of incontinence after these lifestyle modifications requires the physician to evaluate the internal and external anal sphincters. Anal endosonography and manometry provide an evaluation of sphincter structure and function. If an isolated muscle defect is seen, sphincteroplasty can be tried. If this surgical procedure is not indicated, biofeedback may be an option. Biofeedback should be considered for patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence, a weak but structurally intact external sphincter, or a decreased ability to perceive rectal distention. Muscle transposition to create a neosphincter should be offered only by surgeons with extensive experience performing this surgery. Because of the cosmetic sequela of colostomy, this surgery is often considered as a last-step procedure, despite being safe and effective.

Identifiers

PMID11469983
OpenAlexW3190188755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.